Declaration, circa 29 April 1837 [Patterson and Patterson v. Cahoon, Carter & Co. and Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery]

  • Source Note
  • Historical Introduction
Page 126
image
State of Ohio)
ss.)
Court of Common Pleas, vacation after March Term A.D. 1837.
, , , Joseph Smith Jr. and , (the Sheriff having returned “not found as to ” against whom process in this case also issued) were summoned to answer unto and in a plea of Assumpsit, whereupon the said plaintiffs by Payne & Wil[l]son their Att[orney]ys. complain of the defendants, for that whereas on the fourteenth day of December in the year one thousand eight hundred and thirty six to wit, at [p. 126]
State of Ohio)
ss.)
Court of Common Pleas, vacation after March Term A.D. 1837.
, , , Joseph Smith Jr. and , (the Sheriff having returned “not found as to ” against whom process in this case also issued) were summoned to answer unto and in a plea of Assumpsit, whereupon the said plaintiffs by Payne & Willson their Attorneyys. complain of the defendants, for that whereas on the fourteenth day of December in the year one thousand eight hundred and thirty six to wit, at [p. 126]
Page 126