1. Home
  2. The Papers
Introduction to State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot Complaint, 10 August 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Warrant, 10 August 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Subpoena, 6 September 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Recognizance, 7 September 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Complaint, 28 August 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Complaint, 12 September 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Warrant, 12 September 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Recognizance, 18 September 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Transcript of Proceedings, circa 18 September 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Indictment, circa 10 April 1839 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Docket Entry, Indictment, 11 April 1839 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Docket Entry, Removal Orders, 11 April 1839 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Writ of Capias, 30 May 1839 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Docket Entry, Continuance, 14 August 1839 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Docket Entry, Nolle Prosequi, 10 December 1839 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Docket Entry, Costs, 15 April 1840 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Indictment, circa 10 April 1839, Copy [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Docket Entry, Indictment, 11 April 1839, Copy [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Docket Entry, Removal Orders, 11 April 1839, Copy [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Docket Entry, Continuance, 17 August 1839 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot]

Docket Entry, Nolle Prosequi, 10 December 1839 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot]

  • Source Note
  • Historical Introduction
Page 151
image
The State of ) Indictment for Riot
vs)
& others)
And now at this day came the Circuit Attorney who Prosecutes for the in this behalf (and there having been no Service of the Writ of Capias on the defendants herein) and Says that he will no farther Prosecute the said Indictments against the defendants herein; It is therefore on considered by the Court here that the said Defendnts go hence thereof without day and that they Recover of the said State of their costs by them in this behalf Expended. [p. 151]
The State of ) Indictment for Riot
vs)
& others)
And now at this day came the Circuit Attorney who Prosecutes for the in this behalf (and there having been no Service of the Writ of Capias on the defendants herein) and Says that he will no farther Prosecute the said Indictment against the defendants herein; It is therefore considered by the Court here that the said Defendnts go hence thereof without day and that they Recover of the said State of their costs by them in this behalf Expended. [p. 151]
View entire transcript |
Cite this page
Cite this page
Page 151
151
Contact Us FAQ Follow Us on Facebook

Request for Documents

Do you know of any Joseph Smith documents that we might not have heard about? Tell us

The Church Historian’s Press is an imprint of the Church History Department of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah, and a trademark of Intellectual Reserve, Inc.

© 2019 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use (Updated 2018-09-01) | Privacy Notice (Updated 2018-09-01) |