Introduction to City of Nauvoo v. Davis for Ardent Spirits

 

On 1 December 1842, swore a complaint before JS against for selling small quantities of liquor in violation of the city’s temperance ordinance. Davis, a merchant and tavern keeper in , Illinois, had joined the church in 1840, but in 1842 his relationship with JS and the church deteriorated. In March JS brought charges against Davis for his character, and a jury found Davis guilty of violating Nauvoo’s vagrancy and disorderly persons ordinance. Between 29 November and 6 December 1842, Davis was accused of violating several city ordinances and was tried in five cases in Nauvoo courts. In each of these cases, JS participated as either mayor, justice of the peace, complainant, or witness.

initiated one of the five cases with his complaint on 1 December. JS issued a warrant based on the complaint, and was arrested the next day. On the same day as the arrest, 2 December, JS presided at the trial in the mayor’s court. and represented the , while Davis represented himself. After hearing witness testimony, JS found Davis guilty and fined him twenty-five dollars.

appealed his conviction to the Nauvoo Municipal Court on 6 December. That day, issued a subpoena for twelve witnesses. represented Davis, while continued to represent the . JS, as chief justice, presided over the appeal and was joined by the other justices of the municipal court. After hearing witness testimony, the court upheld the verdict and fine, after which Davis announced his intention to appeal the municipal court’s decision.

On 19 January 1843, filed a notice of appeal before the Circuit Court, and the appeal was heard at the May 1843 term. This appeal was one of three that Davis made to the circuit court following his string of prosecutions in in late November and early December 1842. Because of the similarities between the three cases in the circuit court, some of the same documents were used multiple times, and it is possible that some were misfiled and are currently associated with the wrong case. According to an attorney’s agreement signed before the circuit court proceedings, the three appeals were to focus on “the legailty of the Ordinances and if the City Council has the authority under the charter to pass said Ordinances.” Subsequently, on 16 May 1843, C. O. Warner, the defense attorney, filed a motion to dismiss the suits, while , Nauvoo’s attorney, filed to dismiss Davis’s appeals. All of the motions used almost identical language. Warner claimed that the proceedings had been contrary to the constitutions of and the and that no law or ordinance had been violated. Bachman, meanwhile, primarily objected to the procedures of Davis’s appeals, claiming that his appeal bonds were irregularly entered and that the appeal to the circuit court was improper. On 23 May, the circuit court rejected the motions to dismiss and instead held a jury trial on the temperance charge. Although the jurors upheld Davis’s conviction on 24 May, they reduced the fine from twenty-five dollars to 6¼ cents. The costs and fine were subsequently collected later that year.

For the other cases involving JS that were brought against around this time, see City of Nauvoo v. Davis for Slander of JS–B, City of Nauvoo v. Davis for Slander of JS–C, City of Nauvoo v. Davis for Assault, and City of Nauvoo v. Davis for Slander of Miles.

 

This calendar lists all known documents created by or for the court, whether extant or not. It does not include versions of documents created for other purposes, though those versions may be listed in footnotes. In certain cases, especially in cases concerning unpaid debts, the originating document (promissory note, invoice, etc.) is listed here. Note that documents in the calendar are grouped with their originating court. Where a version of a document was subsequently filed with another court, that version is listed under both courts.