Opinion, circa 30 May 1844 [U.S. v. Jeremiah Smith–A]

  • Source Note
Page [1]
image
A Law of the U. S. [State] can not infringe upon the Law of
Instructed to say that does not recognise the authority of this Court.
Chas. B. Penrose Solr. [Solicitor]of Treasury.
Writ of Habeas has nothing to do with this case. Must get a writ from or some other judg— of
33d. Sec act 1789. [p. [1]]
A Law of the S. State can not infringe upon the Law of
Instructed to say that does not recognise the authority of this Court.
Chas. B. Penrose Solr. [Solicitor]of Treasury.
Writ of Habeas has nothing to do with this case. Must get a writ from or some other judg— of
33d. Sec act 1789. [p. [1]]
Page [1]